Topic 6 Dealing with and Understanding Competition



Kotler on Marketing; “Poor firms ignore their competitors; average firms copy their competitors; winning firms lead their competitors”

In Topic 6 we will look at who the primary competitors are, How to ascertain their strategies, objectives, strengths and weaknesses, and reaction patterns, How to design a competitive intelligence system, and whether to position as market leader, challenger, follower or nicher and also how to balance a customer versus competitor orientation.

Markets have become so competitive, understanding customers is no longer enough. Companies must start paying keen attention to their competitors. Successful companies design and operate systems for gathering continuous intelligence about competitors.’

Competitive Forces
To understand the nature and characteristics of competitors, let us look at Michael Potter five forces that determine the intrinsic long-run profit attractiveness of a market.

1.      Threat of intense segment rivalry
2.      Threat of new entrants
3.      Threat of substitute products
4.      Threat of buyers’ growing bargaining power
5.      Threat of suppliers’ growing bargaining power

Threat of intense segment rivalry - A segment is unattractive if it already contains numerous strong or aggressive competitors. It is even more unattractive if it is stable or declining, fixed costs are high, exit barrier are high. There will be continuous price war, advertising battles, new product introduction which will make it expensive to compete.

Threat of new entrants - The segment’s attractiveness varies with the height of its entry and exit barriers. The most attractive segment is one in which entry barriers are high and exit barriers are low. The worst case is when entry barriers are low and exit barriers are high. Here firms enter during good times but find it hard to leave during bad time. The result is chronic overcapacity and depressed earnings for all.

Threat of substitute products - A segment is unattractive when there are actual or potential substitutes for the product. Substitutes place       a limit on prices and on profits. Companies have to monitor price trends closely. If technology advances or competition increases in these substitute industries, prices and profits in the segment are likely to fall.

Threat of buyers’ growing bargaining power - A segment is unattractive if the buyers possess strong or growing bargaining power. A better defense consists of  developing superior offers that strong buyers cannot refuse.
Threat of suppliers’ growing bargaining power - A segment is unattractive if the company’s suppliers are able to raise prices or reduce quantity supplied. The best defenses are to build win-win relations with suppliers or use multiple supply sources.

Identifying Competitors
A company is more likely to be hurt by emerging competitors or new technology than by current competitors. In recent years, many businesses failed to look to the internet for their most formidable competitors.

Example 1: Barnes & Noble and Borders bookstore chains and Jeffrey Bezos cyber bookstore Amazon.com.  

A few years back Barnes & Nobles and Borders bookstore chains were competing to see who could build the most megastores where book browsers could sink into comfortable couches and sip coffee. While they were still deciding, Jeffrey Bezos was building an on-line empire called Amazon.Com.
Example 2): 230 years old Encyclopedia Britannica & Microsoft’s Encarta.

In 1996, 230 years old Encyclopedia Britannica dismissed it entire home sales force after the arrival of its $5 per month subscription Internet site made the idea of owning a 32-volume set of books for $1,250 less appealing to parents. Britannica decided to create an on-line site after realizing that computer-savvy kids most often sought information on-line or CD-ROMs such as Microsoft Encarta which sold for $50. 

What really smarts is that Britannica had the opportunity to partner with Microsoft in providing content for Encarta but refused. In 1999 Britannica made its entire encyclopedia available on-line at no cost and began earning revenue via Web advertising sales.

Industry Concept of Competition
We can examine competition from both an industry and a marketing point of view. What exactly is an industry? An industry is a group of firms that offer a product or class of products that are close substitutes for one another. Industries are classified according to;

1.      Number of Sellers
2.      Degree of Product Differentiation
3.      Presence or Absence of Entry, Mobility and Exit barrier
4.      Cost structure,
5.      Degree of Vertical Integration
6.      Degree of Globalization

Number of Sellers and Degree of Differentiation
Monopoly - One firm provides a certain product or service. In a country or area. An unregulated monopolist might charge a high price, do little or no advertising. A regulated monopolist is required to charge a lower price and provide more service as a matter of public interest.

 Oligopoly – Usually a small number of large companies produce products that range from highly differentiated to standardize.

Pure Oligopoly – consists of a few companies producing essentially the same commodity (Oil, Steel).
Differentiated Oligopoly – consists of a few companies producing products (auto, camera) partially differentiated along lines of quality, features, styling or services.
  
Monopolistic competition – Competitor able to differentiate their offers in whole or in part. E.g. beauty shop, restaurants. Competitors focus on market segments where they can meet customer needs in a superior way and command a price premium.
                
Pure competition – Many competitors offer the same product and services. E.g. Stock market, Commodity market. No competitor will advertise unless advertising can create a psychological differences within the industry.

Entry, Mobility and Exit barrier - Industry differs greatly in ease of entry. It is easy to open a new restaurant but difficult to enter the aircraft industry. Major entry barriers include high capital requirements, economies of scale, patents and licensing requirements, scarce locations, raw materials, distributors and reputation requirements.

 An industry may face mobility barrier when it tries to enter more attractive market segment Firms face exit barriers such as legal or moral obligations to customers, creditors and employees, government restrictions.

Cost structure - Each industry has a certain cost burden that shapes much of its strategic conduct. Firms strive to reduce their largest costs. E.g. Steelmaking involves heavy manufacturing and raw material costs.

Degree of Vertical Integration - Companies find it advantageous to integrate backward or forward (vertical integration). E.g. Major oil producers carry on oil exploration, oil drilling, oil refining, chemical manufacture and service stations operation. Vertical integration often lowers costs, and the company gains a larger share of the value-added stream.
Degree of Globalization - Some industries are highly local while others are global (Oil, Aircraft engines etc). Companies in global industries need to compete on a global basis if they are to achieve economies of scale and keep up with the latest advance in technology.

Market Concept of Competition
In addition to the industry approach, we can identify competitors using the market approach. The market concept of competition reveals a broader set of actual and potential competitors. Competitors are companies that satisfy the same customer need. Example: a customer who buys a word-processing package really wants “writing ability” a need that can also be satisfied by pencils, pens or typewriters. Example: Eastman Kodak (film business) Olympus for buying camera and Fuji for buying film.

Analyzing Competitors
Once a company identifies its primary competitors, it must ascertain their characteristics;

·         Strategies
·         Objectives
·         Strengths and weaknesses
·         Reaction patterns
 
Competitors Strategies
A group of firms following the same strategy in a given market is called a strategic group. Companies need to constantly monitor the strategies of their competitors and attempt to either outperform them using the same strategy or develop an opposing strategy which is more in tune with consumer needs.

Competitors Objectives
 Determining the objectives of a competitor is useful because it gives one an insight on how competitors may respond to different types of competition.

·         Is the objective short term profit maximization or long term?
·         Is it mixed objective – profitability, market share growth, cash flow, technological leadership, services leadership?                 
Companies must also monitor its competitor expansion plans.

Questions need to be asked;
·         What is each competitor seeking in the market place?
·         What drives each competitor’s behavior?
Many factors shape a competitor’s objectives, including size, history, current management, and financial situation.
If the competitor is a division of a large company, it is important to know whether the parent company is running it for growth, profit or as a milking cow.

Strengths and weaknesses
A company needs to gather information on each competitor’s strengths and weaknesses. Is the competitor?

Dominant – Controls the behavior of other competitors and has a wide choice of strategic options.

Strong – Take independent action without endangering its long- term position.

Favorable – Has exploitable strength and a more–than average opportunity to improve its position.
A company needs to gather information on each competitor’s Strengths and weaknesses. Is the competitor?

Tenable – Performing at a sufficiently satisfactory level to warrant continuing in business, but exists at the sufferance of the dominant company and has a less than average opportunity to improve its position.

Weak - Unsatisfactory performance but can improve.

Nonviable – Unsatisfactory performance and cannot improve. To improve market share, many companies benchmark their most successful competitors, as well as world-class performers. The technique is aimed at improving or copying on best practices either within an industry or across industries.

Reaction patterns
Companies react differently to competitive assaults. Some are slow to respond, others respond only to certain types of attacks such as price cuts while others strike back swiftly and strongly to any assault. Frequent price war, Price war are frequent as a result of cost breakthroughs,

Designing Competitive Intelligence System
·         Have an Intelligence System in place
·         Selecting Competitors
·         Designing Competitive strategies

Having an Intelligence System in Place

1.      Setting Up the System – identifying vital type of competitors’ information, identifying the best sources of this information & assigning a system manager.

2.      Collecting the Data – Data collected on a continuous basis from people doing business with the competitors in the field. (Sales force, suppliers, market research firm, trade associations).

3.      Evaluating and Analyzing the Data – The data are checked for validity and reliability, interpreted and organized.

4.      Disseminating Information and Responding – Key information is sent to relevant decision makers and manager’s inquiries are answered. With a well design system, company managers receive timely information about competitor via e-mails, telephone calls etc.

Selecting Competitors
With good competitive intelligence, managers will find it easier to formulate competitive strategies. Companies can begin with Customer value analysis (CVA). Customer Value Analysis – Customers choosing between competitive brand offerings on the basis of which delivers the most customer value? Customer Value = Customer Benefits – Customer Costs.

Customer Benefits include Product Benefits, Service Benefits, Personnel Benefits and Image Benefits.
Very often managers conduct a Customer Value Analysis to reveal the company’s strength and weaknesses relative to various competitors. Major steps in such an analysis are;

Identify the major attributes customers’ value – Customers are asked what attributes and performance levels they look for in choosing a product or vendors.

Assess the quantitative importance of the different attributes – Customers are asked to rate the importance of the different attributes. If the customers diverge too much in their ratings they should be clustered into different segments.

Assess the company’s and competitors’ performance on the different customer values against their rated importance.

Examine how a customer in a specific segment rates the company’s performance against a specific competitor on an attribute-by-attribute basis.

Monitor customer values over time – The Company must periodically redo its studies of customer values and competitor standings as the economy, technology and features change.

Classes of Competitors

Customer Value Analysis – After the company has conducted its customer value analysis, it can focus its attack on one of the following classes of competitors:

Strong versus Weak – Most companies aims their shot at weak competitors, because this requires fewer resources per share point gained.

Close versus Distant - Most companies compete with competitors who resemble them the most. E.g. Chevrolet competes with Ford not with Jaguar.

Good versus Bad – A company should support its good competitors and attack its bad competitors. Good competitors play by the industry rules.

Designing Competitive Strategies
Competitive Strategies can be designed by classifying firms by the roles they play in the target market. Are the Competitors; Market Leaders, Challenger, Follower or Nicher.

Market Leader Strategies – The firm has a large market share in the relevant product market. Usually leads in price changes, new product introductions, distribution coverage and Promotional Intensity

Example of Market Leaders
·         Kodak (photography),
·         Microsoft (Computer software),
·         Caterpillar (Earth moving equipment),
·         Coke Cola (Soft drinks)

The market leader should look for new users, new uses and more usage of its products.

Expanding the Total Marketing – the dominant firm normally gains the most when the total market expands. 

Defending Market Share – While trying to expand total market size, the dominant firm must continuously defend its current business.
Defense Strategies – Position defense involves building superior brand power, making the brand almost impregnable.

Designing Competitive Defense Strategies.

Flank Defense – The market leader should also erect outposts to protect a weak front or possibly serve as an invasion base for counterattack.

Preemptive Defense – A more aggressive maneuver is to attack before the enemy starts its offense. A company can launch a preemptive defense in several ways. It can wage guerrilla action across the market (hit here and there) and keep everyone off balance.

Counteroffensive Defense – When attacked most market leader will respond with a counterattack. An effective counterattack is to invade the attackers main territory so that it will pull back its competition.
Mobile Defense – In mobile defense, the leader stretches its domain over new territories that can serve as future centers for defense and offensive. It spread through market broadening and market diversification.
Contraction Defense – Large companies sometimes recognize that they can no longer defend all of their territory. The best plan of action then appears to be planned contraction (also called strategic withdrawal).

Designing Competitive Strategies (Expanding Market Share)  
Expanding Marketing Share – Market leaders can improve their profitability by increasing their market share. In many markets, one share point is worth tens of millions of dollars. No wonder normal competition has turned into marketing warfare. It should be noted that gaining market share does not automatically produce higher profits. Much depends on the company’s strategy for gaining increased market share.

Market Challenger Strategies – Firms that usually occupy second, third or lower ranks in an industry are often called runner up, or trailing firms.

Example of Market Challenger – Colgate, Ford, Avis and Pepsi Cola. These firms are quite large in their own right. They can adopt one or two postures and attack the leader and other competitor in an aggressive bid for further market share or they can play along with the leaders.

Defining the strategic objective and opponents – A market challenger must first define its strategic objectives. Most aim to increase market share.

Choosing a General Attack Strategy - What attack options are available? Frontal Attack, Flank Attack, Encirclement Attack, Bypass Attack, Guerrilla Warfare.

Choosing a General Attack Strategy - What attack options are available?
Frontal Attack – Attacker matches its opponent’s product, advertising, price and distribution.
Flank Attack – Concentrated on weaknesses. Flank attack can be directed along two strategic dimension geographical and segmental.
Encirclement Attack – Attempt to capture a wide slice of the enemy territory through a blitz. Launching grand offensive on several front.
Bypass Attack – Bypassing the enemy and attacking easier markets to broaden one’s resource base
Guerrilla Warfare – Consists of waging small, intermittent attacks to harass and demoralize the opponent and eventually secure permanent footholds.

Choosing a Specific Attack Strategy – The challenger must go beyond the five broad strategies and develop more specific strategies:

Price Discount – Offer comparable product at lower price
Lower Price Goods – Offer an average or lower quality product at a much lower price
Prestige Goods – Market challenger can launch a higher quality product and charge a higher price.
Prestige Goods – Market challenger can launch a higher quality product and charge a higher price.
Product Proliferation – The Challenger can attack the leader by launching a larger product variety, thus giving buyers more choice.
Product innovation – The challenger can pursue product innovation.
Improved Services – The challenger can offer new or better services to customers.
Prestige Goods – Market challenger can launch a higher quality product and charge a higher price.
Product Proliferation – The Challenger can attack the leader by launching a larger product variety, thus giving buyers more choice.
Product innovation – The challenger can pursue product innovation.
Improved Services – The challenger can offer new or better services to customers.

Market Follower Strategies – Most companies prefers to follow rather than challenge the leader. They must know how to hold and retain their current customers. The follower has to define a growth path, but one that does not invite competitive retaliation. Four broad strategies can be distinguished;
Counterfeiter – Duplicating the leader’s product.
Cloner – Emulating the leader’s product, name and packaging with slight variation.
Imitator – Copies but maintain some differentiation.
Adapter – Takes the leader’s product, adapt or improves it.
Market Follower Strategies – Most companies prefers to follow rather than challenge the leader. They must know how to hold and retain their current customers.

Market-nicher Strategies – An alternative to be a leader in a big market is to be a leader in a smaller market. The key idea in nichemanship is specialization. The following specialist roles are open to nichers:

End-user specialist; Vertical-level specialist; Customer size specialist; Specific customer specialist; Geographic specialist; Product feature specialist; Job-shop specialist; Quality price specialist; Service specialist; Channel specialist.

Balancing Customer and Competitor Orientations
In today's global market, companies should not overdo the emphasis on competitors but maintain a good balance of consumers and competitor monitoring. Clearly Customer-Centered Companies are in a better position to identify new opportunities and set a course that promises to deliver long-run profits.
By monitoring customer needs, a customer-centered company can decide which customer groups and emerging needs are the most important to serve given its resources and objectives.

Summary and Conclusion
To prepare an effective marketing strategy, a company must study its competitors as well as its actual and potential customers. Companies need to identify competitor strategies, objectives, strengths, weaknesses and reaction patterns. They also need to know how to design an effective competitive intelligence system.

A company’s closest competitors are those seeking to satisfy the same customers and needs and making similar offers. A company should also pay attention to latent competitors, who may offer new or other ways to satisfy the same needs.

Competitive intelligence needs to be collected, interpreted and disseminated continuously. Managers should be able to receive timely information about competitors.

Managers need to conduct a customer value analysis to reveal the company’s strengths and weaknesses relative to competitors. The aim of this analysis is to determine the benefits customers want and how they perceive the relative value of competitors’ offers.

A market leader has the largest market share in the relevant product market. To remain dominant, the leader looks for ways to expand total market demand, attempts to protect its current market share, and perhaps tries to increase its market share.

A market challenger attacks the market leader and other competitors in an aggressive bid for more market share. Challengers must also choose specific strategies, discount prices, produce cheaper goods, produce prestige goods, produce a wide variety of goods, product and distribution innovation, improve services, reduce manufacturing costs or engage in intensive advertising.

A market follower is a runner up firm that is willing to maintain its market share and not rock the boat. A follower can play the role of counterfeiter, cloner, imitator or adapter.

A market nicher serves small market segments not being served by larger firm (Specialization).
As important as a competitive orientation is in today’s global markets, companies should not overdo the emphasis on competitors. They should maintain a good balance of consumer and competitor monitoring.


Source: Marketing Management 11th Edition, Philip Kotler (2003) Apprentice Hall

No comments:

Post a Comment